IHRA Chair Lord Eric Pickles responds to recent discussions surrounding the IHRA Working Definition of Antisemitism, emphasizing its role as a valuable tool in combating antisemitism while respecting freedom of expression.

IHRA Chair Lord Eric Pickles states:

“Any allegation that the IHRA working definition of antisemitism is incompatible with international standards on freedom of expression is simply wrong. It is very disappointing that the UN Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression should make such an unfounded allegation in her 23 August 2024 report.   

The working definition of antisemitism is an analytical tool with a solid and proven track record of guiding governments and organizations in education and training on the threat of contemporary antisemitism. Given that the non-legally binding definition does not infringe upon freedom of speech in any way and expressly states that criticism of Israel is compatible with the definition, it is a matter of regret that the Special Rapporteur should so seriously misdirect herself. Unfortunately, these groundless accusations are made while Jewish students are threatened on university campuses and while Jewish communities and institutions are under physical attack.

I, therefore, urge all governments and organizations of goodwill to reaffirm their support for the IHRA working definition of antisemitism as a crucial resource in countering the rising levels of antisemitism that threaten community cohesion worldwide.”